PUBLICATIONS
July 2001 Issue
The Geographical Review
July 2001, Vol. 91 (3), pp. 509-524
BIODIVERSITY AND LAND-USE CHANGE IN THE AMERICAN MOUNTAIN WEST
JEREMY D. MAESTAS, RICHARD L. KNIGHT, and WENDELL C. GILGERT
Keywords: biodiversity, exurban development, land
use, ranching.
Click here to view the abstract and first page in Adobe Acrobat format.
ABSTRACT:
Rural private lands in the Mountain West of the United States are undergoing a
profound land-use conversion, from agriculture to low-density residential or exurban development,
though little scientific study documents the ecological consequences of this change.
Nongovernmental conservation organizations are working with ranchers to keep rangeland
out of development and in ranching, ostensibly because these organizations believe that
biodiversity is better protected on ranches than on exurban developments. We compared
plant and wildlife communities across the principal rural land uses in the Mountain West:
protection, livestock ranching, and exurban development. Native plant and faunal biodiversity
was better maintained on ranches and protected areas than on exurban developments. Exurban
developments favored species that were nonnative or adapted to human-altered environments.
The continued conversion of ranches to exurban development suggests a long-term
alteration of the region's natural heritage.
Keywords: biodiversity, exurban development, land
use, ranching.
Rural private lands in the Mountain West of the United States are undergoing a profound land-use conversion, from agriculture to low-density residential or exurban development, though little scientific study documents the ecological consequences of this change. Nongovernmental conservation organizations are working with ranchers to keep rangeland out of development and in ranching, ostensibly because these organizations believe that biodiversity is better protected on ranches than on exurban developments. We compared plant and wildlife communities across the principal rural land uses in the Mountain West: protection, livestock ranching, and exurban development. Native plant and faunal biodiversity was better maintained on ranches and protected areas than on exurban developments. Exurban developments favored species that were nonnative or adapted to human-altered environments. The continued conversion of ranches to exurban development suggests a long-term alteration of the region's natural heritage.